Leyland P76 Owners 2004 | 
		Technical problem | 
		 | 
	 
 
 [215V8] LPG Compression Ratio 
 
 Question
    
  - I'm planning on building a 4.0L/4.6L stroker with large-valve 300 heads to run on LPG (propane).
 
  - I can improve my efficiency if I use a CR of 11:1 - 12:1.
 
  - Anyone know what CR I can safely and reliably run the engine on? Warm
 
  - Regards
 
  - Shawn
 
 
 
Answer
  - Hello Shawn,
 
  - As you know, propane has a much higher octane rating than the best available
 
  - pump gasoline -- nominally 105 octane on the R+M/2 scale. That said, there are
 
  - a number of factors that effect an engine's octane requirements. Each of the
 
  - following can have an influence: camshaft timing and duration (overlap),
 
  - cylinder head design, bore diameter, spark plug location, material of construction
 
  - (aluminum is more tolerant), engine temperature, air temperature and ignition
 
  - timing.
 
  
  - I have zero experience with the 4.0L/4.6L stroker or the Buick 300 heads but
 
  - I do have experience with the Oldsmobile and Buick versions of the 215 and
 
  - also with propane.
 
  
  - It is my understanding that the Oldsmobile head is more detonation resistant
 
  - than the Buick head. My reading has also led me to believe that the Buick head
 
  - actually flows a bit better than the Olds, thus providing more top end power.
 
  
  
  - Now for my real world, first hand experience. I built a Buick 215 for my
 
  - wife's Chevy Vega. That engine had a mild camshaft, about 8.5 to 1 static
 
  - compression, ran premium grade (91 octane) and never detonated.  The second engine was
 
  - an Olds 215 using the small chamber heads along with high domed Arias pistons
 
  - yielding a ratio of 13.5 to 1. The camshaft profile was non-stock but rather
 
  - mild. That engine did not detonate at its home altitude of 4,000 FT but did at
 
  - sea-level -- even using 93-octane fuel. Initial time for both engine was set
 
  - at 10 degrees BTDC but the 13.5 to 1 engine needed to be backed down to 5
 
  - degrees initial to forestall detonation at sea level.
 
  
  - Now to propane.  The Vega and Buick engine were ultimately sold. The Olds
 
  - version of the 215 was rebuilt and sits in my son's Corvair.  Here is my logic:
 
  - If that high compression engine could survive on 91 octane gasoline -- it would
 
  - dearly love 105 octane propane.
 
  
  - Again, I have no experience with the 4 liter or 4.6 liter engines nor do I
 
  - have experience with the Buick 300 heads but my personal experience would say
 
  - that you should have few problems with propane at the compression levels you
 
  - anticipate.
 
  
  - Some of our British and Australian list members may have different
 
  - experiences based on the use of propane in the Rover products. But I believe that most
 
  - of those applications were duel fuel and not optimized for propane.
 
  
  - http://www.propanecarbs.com/propane.html Propane Facts & Comparison Charts
 
  
  - http://www.patooyee.com/propane/propane_1.htm   Propane:  Page 1
 
  
  
  - Darius 
 
 
 
Another reply 
  - Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006
 
  
  - Back in the '80s I used to work for Petrolane, the propane gas distriburor,  and we did conversions.
 
  - If I remember correctly the max recommended compression ratio was about 10.5:1.
 
  - Even though propane is high octane (110) since it is a dry gas, you don't get and evaporative cooling of the
 
  - charge, making it somewhat susceptible to detonation at high compression ratios.
 
  - I am working from memory here but will try and dig up some info if there is interest.
 
  - P Knowles
 
 
 
  
		
		 |     | 
		   | 
		     |  
		  
	
		|  
		   | 
		
	Last updated  Dec, 2005  | 
		
		
		This web site may contain Copyright material 
If you find any problems with the site, please email the 
 Web Editor   | 
		 
	 			
   
						
 		 |